“Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.”
The arts still play a vital role in society as it incorporates the culture, customs, and beauty of a nation. Government should be funding this program because it is an important aspect of society and its citizens. However, drastic measures need to be taken during extreme cases. Therefore, when a significant amount of people who are hungry and unemployed, suspending government funding for the arts should be allowed.
The most important part of a nation is its citizens because society would not be able to function without workers and consumers. The government’s responsibility is to therefore care for these people and ensure their abilities are not compromised so society is not comprised. One way the government helps is by science, technology, education, road construction, and more. This helps with the growth and development of the nation to ensure everything flows smoothly. However, of all these different areas, the arts is one of the few that does not provide immediate benefits. While science can help find cures to diseases, the arts provide aesthetic satisfaction for citizens. Although still an important field, the government must take fast action when extreme circumstances arise in order to curve the potential consequences. If a significant number of citizens are being affected, then cutting the funds of one program to care for these people is very reasonable.
Suspending funds for the arts gives the government some extra money that can be used to directly attack the problem at hand. The money can be used to build more homeless shelters which will combat the amount of citizens on the streets who are no longer able to sustain themselves or their families; food can also be given to these people for free without worrying about a deficit in funds. Ultimately, suspending the funds for the arts will allow the government to better take care of their citizens while society is still able to flourish due to advances in other fields that did not get cut.
There are many reasons why suspending the funds are beneficial, but it can also negatively impact the nation’s it unity cause it to lose its cultural values. There are many citizens who take pride in the arts and consider it their lives. For example, dancers, artists, pianists, singers, museum-owners, and more will all lose their jobs if funds are suspended. Therefore, the outcome would just increase the amount of people who are unemployed and hungry. However, if the funds were not cut, those who are already in despair will not get the proper help and treatment. Also, the additional people who may fall into this category afterwards, will also benefit from the money allocated by the government.
The arts is a great aspect of society and should be cherished for the customs, traditions, and cultural values it holds. However, it is the government’s responsibility to care for its citizens. When people are at-risk, action needs to be taken. Although unfortunate, funding for the arts should be cut since there are a significant amount of people who are unemployed and hungry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...llocated by the government. The arts is a great aspect of society and should be...
^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ld be cut since there are a significant amount of people who are unemployed and hungry...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0966469428 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85785952888 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457593688363 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2906456408 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.36 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.28 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377789876159 0.243740707755 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104707257396 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970647776997 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225417311235 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460033402795 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.