Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources.
Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo ur own knowledge or experience
Over the past few decades, help endangered animal species from extinction become public attention in many countries around the world. Some people believe that this act is useless and waste of money because extinction is part of the way nature works. I totally disagree with this statements based with my points of view.
First of all, extinction could disturbing the balance of nature and threatening environmental ecosystem. In life there is food-chain or food-webs which contains producer, consumer and decomposer with every each part. If the existence of one living thing in food-webs lost it could cause natural imbalances and rise of one party. For instance, snake extinction as a tertiary consumer could cause the amount of secondary consumer,such as frog, skyrocketed; moreover, the number of grasshopper as a primary consumer decreased significantly.
Furthermore, our obligation as humans are to secure and conserve environment for future life and humankind. Shark is one of threatened species who is facing extinction. Asia people believe that shark fin contains nutrition and healthy for our body, although until now there has been no research results that prove the validity of the info. By preserve shark existence, we help our children and grandchildren to learn about shark and ocean ecosystem.
To summarize, many people believe that the extinction of endangered animal species is natural and people should not working too hard to save endangered species. However, I really disagree with this statement because it is human task as a the most perfect living things to maintain the existence of animal so environmental ecosystem will be balance and our future generation could learn and enjoy the nature diversity as it should be
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 61 | view |
- The Chart shows the fertility rates in China and USA from 1920 to 2000. 67
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world 11
- Saving Endangered Animal 84
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Leisure Activities of Europian Adults 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y nature works. I totally disagree with this statements based with my points of view...
^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'disturb'
Suggestion: disturb
...view. First of all, extinction could disturbing the balance of nature and threatening e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , such
...d cause the amount of secondary consumer,such as frog, skyrocketed; moreover, the num...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...pecies is natural and people should not working too hard to save endangered species. Ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...s statement because it is human task as a the most perfect living things to maintain ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35869565217 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88224353018 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1758887398 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.769230769 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120977597376 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042685849079 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464732653984 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760177143061 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459837391448 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.