The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.
The chart illustrate the GDP growth in Tunisia, Japan, and Ecuador between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, the GDP growth in Tunisia decreased as the year. The difference case in Japan, the GDP increased as the year progressed.
It can be seen in the chart, in 2017 the percentagte of GDP growth in Tunisia was 6% while in Ecuador was 3% and only 2% in Japan. In three years, the GDP growth in Tunisia decreased from 6% in 2007 to just 3% in 2010. In Ecuador, the GDP growth increased in 2007 was 3% to more than 4% in 2008 but it decreased dramatically in 2009 was only around 1% then in 2010 it increased around 2%. And it was not the same in Japan, the GDP growth in Japan increased progressed more than 6% in 2010 from 2% in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Arman Mansyur | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweight than the disadvantages ? 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollition problems To what extend do you agree or disagree with above statement 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The chart illustrate the GDP growth in Tunisia, Japan, and E...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 598.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27142857143 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39519075973 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 61.0 106.607317073 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435714285714 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 155.7 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5476110739 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4285714286 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318668620128 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197848825634 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874269269054 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269982511016 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656180702898 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.32 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 15.0 40.7170731707 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.