The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001
and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of the early-year recruitment of teachers with regular teaching jobs according to a year of graduation in Ontario over six years, from 2001 to 2007.
Overall, while regular job rates for early-year English-language program graduates fell significantly, French-language rose at the end of the period, although both saw a similar proportion at the beginning.
In 2001, the proportion of French-language teachers was 70 per cent, just at a bit lower rate than English-language teachers, roughly 2 per cent. Over the next two years, the figure slipped but then recovered slightly and peaked at 65 per cent for French-language teachers, while fell markedly for English-language teachers.
Since 2003, it is clear that the percentage of French-language teachers rose gradually and hit a peak at 75 per cent in the last year. In contrast, the figure increased moderately in 2005 but then bottomed out at just below 30 per cent in 2007.
In conclusion, between 2003 and 2007, there was always more recruitment for French-language teacher than for English-language teachers.
- The two graphs compare that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion What sort of punishment should parents and t 100
- information in the graph 11
- Birth rates in China and the USA from 1920 to 2000 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3908045977 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55685378928 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4948975586 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756887528906 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047751006053 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458117495937 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589212681697 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048705747707 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.