Today more and more tourist visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or Antarctic. What are benefits and disadvantage to tourist who visit such places.
In this contemporary era a burgeoning has been seen in the tourism sector. Moreover, it has been observed that the places which have difficult conditions are an obsession to a plethora of travelers. However, these voyagers are privileged with a number of merits, but are exposed to many challenges as well. Both aspects shall be elucidated in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with the benefits of such voyages, one of the best achievement is that explorers get an uncolored touch of nature, this is because the land faraway is almost unimpeded by humanity. To be precise as there is paucity of life at such location it bolsters the beauty of nature and delivers an exhilarating experience. For instance there are plenty of hill stations in India but the scarcely populated is the mesmerizing one.
On the other side of the fence, there are limitations as well of visiting the place that are underdeveloped for tourism. The biggest drawback faced may be of basic necessities themselves. For instance, the places which are exposed to extreme climatic conditions have to stay prepared for myriads of issues which may come up. Consequently, if the visitors are unaware of the probable circumstances, they may be trapped in troubled and exacerbate the situation.
To conclude end to recapitulate it can be said that there are enormous advantages of travelling through places having troublesome conditions but simultaneously the adventurer has to keep zest to look at the possible ramification of the same.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-19 | dhruv018@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | dhruv018@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | dhruv018@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- Today more and more tourist visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or Antarctic. What are benefits and disadvantage to tourist who visit such places. 56
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 56
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 56
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 61
- Employers sometimes ask people applying job for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that these information may be relevant and useful other disagree. Discuss both the view and g 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ng has been seen in the tourism sector. Moreover it has been observed that the places wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...m. The biggest drawback faced may be of basic necessities themselves. For instance, the places wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r instance, the places which are exposed to extreme climatic conditions have to s...
^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the possible ramification of the same.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, as to, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14634146341 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07471892865 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2416800643 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104190583647 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324077737306 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360188445296 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551102091424 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119325975842 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.