Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of
technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Advancement of technological changes increased the means of communication between individuals and among different Nations. These progressions in today’s world has a great impact on various relations in which pupil are involved. I believe that these improvements in social media has brought a positive development to our society.
Online communication made a myriad of citizens to interact with people in other countries. In the past people does not have proper means to communicate with their friends and family residing in abroad. But with the introduction of plethora of means of medium in 20th century brought new changes in the way people behave and bonding with other from varied regions. In a survey it is shown that almost 40% of the people are using social media sites like Facebook, Twitter and others to forge relation with new friends in other countries.
With the spread of latest technology worldwide people from many communities and other nations are initiating to inculcate with foreigners. The relation can be friends, family or life-partner, these communication mediums are helping a huge mass to maintain a healthy atmosphere between them. They feel attached emotionally with their love ones by which they are bonded by various social means. For example, the neighboring Nations Israeli and Iran who fought with each other’s for decades, formed an emotional and friendly relationship between their citizens with the posts and the communication they made between each other.
In conclusion, we can say that media plays an imperative role in present generation as a host of people relay on social media. All these improvements made a drastic change to mankind making lives easier. Finally, advancement of technology is a positive development for fellowship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | khan0229 | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | SATYAVENI YANDRAPU | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | SATYAVENI YANDRAPU | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Priyan ka | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | azinrad | 89 | view |
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion. 73
- Employers should give long holidays to employees to encourage them to do their job well. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Stores should sell local food products and not the imported food products Do you agree or disagree 65
- You have been invited to attend an interview for a place studying a course in a college. Unfortunately, because of a previous appointment you cannot come at the time they wish.Write a letter to the admissions tutor and explain your position. Apologize and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
... in other countries. With the spread of latest technology worldwide people from many c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...el attached emotionally with their love ones by which they are bonded by various soc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41071428571 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98601972122 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567857142857 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6416319349 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.214285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262002579989 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909275756003 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646137026898 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145607085731 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612563428062 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.