The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
The pie graph illustrates the main causes of land degradation while the table provides the three regions affected by these causes during the 1990s. it can be seen that the over-grazing became the most affecting cause of degraded land, and the Europe land degraded more than two other regions.
To begin, there are four causes of farmland degradation: over-grazing, over-cultivation, deforestation, and other causes. However, over-grazing represented the highest proportion at just over one third. The logging resulted the percentage of 30%, and over-planting activities stood inferior to deforestation at just over a quarter. Other causes only affected less than 10% overall.
Supporting the pie graph, the deforestation was seen in the table as the main reason of farmland degradation in The Europe which stood at the peak as their land degraded for 23%. Resulting 13% of land degradation, the south pacific islands, including Australia and New Zealand, became the second victim with the over grazing as the main cause. As the least, the North America’s land was mostly deteriorated due to the over-cultivation issue.
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 73
- Some people believe that boys and girls behave differently only because society teaches them that they are different What is your view 72
- Nowadays children are experiencing increased educational, social, and commercial pressure. What is the cause of this effect? What is a solution to reduce the pressure? 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 56
- Society would benefit from a complete ban of all forms of advertisement.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ected by these causes during the 1990s. it can be seen that the over-grazing becam...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44571428571 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19855069221 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7499103942 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193572213388 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928088569471 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1155425768 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147973081727 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100700623052 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.