Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is that it gives an opportunity to help other people. To what extent, do you agree or disagree
Today, inequality remains pervasive on a global scale. Many of us believe that helping other should at the top of affluent individual’s agenda. Generally, I think that wealth does come with more responsibilities but not compulsorily.
In the age of globalization, people and nations are more closely bonded than ever before and to help those in need reflects moral obligation. People who are desperate in need of assistance are usually deprived from everything, and they can barely face up with the harsh reality without the support from external sources. Therefore, the idea of reaching out to more humans around you are quite essential. With the aid of educational resources from the rich, more schools have been built in less developed are, which created a chance for the young to have the fullest knowledge and help to promote the development of those places in the long run.
However, it is reasonable to claim that the public and nations should have the autonomy of donation and they should never be forced to distribute their money to others. But, in the meantime, one fact should be taken into consideration is that, for instance, the most impoverished nations are places where badly governed, where corruption, abuse, official incompetence and failure to protect basic property rights are capable of trapping miserable lives in adversities. Thus, in a way, the rich should be a part of the solution.
Overall, I believe that privileges come with responsibilities and the favors from wealthy human beings and rich countries should be valued.
- Increasing travel between countries enable people to learn different cultures or to increase tension between people from different countries 92
- A tendency that the news reported in the media focuses on problems and emergencies rather than the positive developments is harmful to both the individual and the society. To what extent, do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitor for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 73
- For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 78
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitor for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent, do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18972332016 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93771363199 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628458498024 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7347266717 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.363636364 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122853603073 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460248687484 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264962445975 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726061180194 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00797085267817 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.