Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The Earth is the most important lagacy that humans can not living without that. All of us will die simply if just one system in the Earth destroys. Many epeople think that human activity damages our planet.Other disagree. In my view, our activities have a strong harm on the Earth for two reasons.
First, there are a lot of factors that produce harmful gases like NO2 and CO2 in the world. These gases have a staite negative impact on the Earth's life. For example, Dubai is one of the most harmful conutries towrds our planet in the world. This country adds a large amount of heat to the world and causes melting ice mountains. This will damage the circulation of all the systems in the world and may causes a lot of deathes and damages for birds and animals. As a result, if they continue to save their country by this way, absoloutly, they will destroy every where in the world,specially themselfs.
Second, in the past 25 years, perishment of trees and animals'rate has been increased dramaticaly. There are a lot of huntings and businesses that result killing them like tiger huntings and lumbering industries. For instance, there are a lot of forests and natural resources in my country. But, there is a factory in the north of Iran that perishes beutiful, tall, and old trees to use them in producing furnitures in the Sanatsazan lumbering company. This factory is just a morsel in comparision with others in the same industry in the world but, certainly, it has a big quota in damgaing the Eath by super using of woods in my country.
In sum, human activities damage the Earth significantly, because not only it causes producing harmful gases in our planet but also perishment of trees and animals has expanded in the past 25 years. We should all involve in making it safe for the next generation.
- TPO-37- Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets (dogs, cats, or other animals), although there are better uses for this money.Use specific reasons and examples t 60
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task 70
- TPO 37 Integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 76
- summarize 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'live'
Suggestion: live
...st important lagacy that humans can not living without that. All of us will die simply...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Other
... that human activity damages our planet.Other disagree. In my view, our activities ha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...this way, absoloutly, they will destroy every where in the world,specially themselfs. Se...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , specially
...ey will destroy every where in the world,specially themselfs. Second, in the past 25 ye...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70440251572 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61145677716 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534591194969 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5281619542 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156578226655 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051620931949 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539990762471 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111341217807 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766311183759 0.0645574589148 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.