Men and women.
Over the past decades, gender equality has been a pressing issue and a central topic of many heated debates. It is no doubt that in the contemporary world, women have a much more meaningful presence and important role in society than before. However, while the physical differences between the two sexes may favor men for more physically demanding endeavors, we cannot immediately conclude that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks, especially taking into account the fact that there are fewer and fewer physical tasks.
First, it is important to realize that setting aside the physical differences between men and women, the two sexes should be equally suited to most tasks, ranging from intellectuals, sciences, to the arts. The reason for this is that these tasks aforementioned do not nesscarily require any physical brilliance. For example, a physically weaker individual could most certainly be a physicist as competent as one a physically stronger individual can be. In fact, people in the professions of sciences, arts, technology, and many other areas are becoming increasingly more diverse in their ethnicity, physical stature, and gender. Thus, if these tasks are equally suited for people of drastically different physical capabilities, there is no reason why they should not be equally suited for different genders. To put this into perspective, there are many women who had made much more impact in different fields that their fellow men colleagues had made. In the field of science for instance, females like Marie Curie, Rosalind Franklin, and Marry Anning are paragons of successful and influential women. Thus, we can see that in fields that are not physically demanding, men and women are equally suited to most tasks.
What about fields that are physically demanding? Before answering this question, we must first realize that in today's society, there are fewer and fewer jobs left that will favor the physically stronger over the weaker. This is because all the labor work, ones that require physical strength, is continuously getting replaced by technological work. Laborious and tedious tasks are gradually, but consistently, being done by robots, automated machines, and large-scale systems thanks to the quick advent of technology. Thus, it would be reasonable to conclude that in the future, there will be fewer and fewer tasks requiring physical skills, and in turn fewer and fewer tasks that are not equally suited to men and women.
Overall, while we see that men and women may share different physical capacities when looking at the average of the population, we also see that are increasingly more fields that are blind to such physical differences, and thus it would be incorrect to state that there are many tasks not equally suited for the two sexes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 50 | view |
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 66
- sdfsf 16
- Men and women. 66
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 66
- "The following opinion was provided in a letter to the editor of a national aeronautics magazine: “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a grea 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not equally suited for the two sexes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in fact, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2352.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19205298013 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73042822979 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479028697572 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6484772097 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.352941176 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6470588235 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223297600514 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863342140297 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100036392242 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166185336767 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531544490838 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.