The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
The given tables illustrate the information about the sale of tea and pineapples by Fairtrade in 5 European countries(France, Austria, Germany, Netherlands, and Norway) for the years 2010 and 2015. The first table gives information about the sales of tea, whereas, the second table displays data on pineapples sales. It is evident from the graph that there is an increase in tea sales from 2010 to 2015 for all countries but the sales for pineapples showed a varied trend among all the countries.
There is a vast growth of the tea sales in France from the year 2010 to 2015. It also recorded the highest sales among all other countries in 2015. Whereas, Germany, Netherlands, and Norway showed very little growth in tea sales from 2010 to 2015. While Austria’s sales showed decent growth across the 2 years recording revenue of 8 million euros in 2015.
The sales of pineapples rocketed in Austria from 2010 to 2015. It recorded a sales of 48 euros which is the highest among all the countries in 2015. France and Netherland showed a good rise in sales from 2010 to 2015 which recorded 6.5 million euros and 5 euros in 2015 respectively. While the sales for Norway and Germany showed a dip between the years 2010 and 2015.
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 84
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 56
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 53
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- Celebrities make a very good living out of media attention and have chosen to live in the public spotlight. They have no right to complain when they feel the media are intruding on their privacy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 214.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77102803738 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61620904026 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 176.041082164 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411214953271 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6964631752 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400415056841 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194993440331 0.084324248473 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107343707256 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305813856277 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134201606253 0.056905535591 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 50.2224549098 154% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.