Celebrities make a very good living out of media attention and have chosen to live in the public spotlight. They have no right to complain when they feel the media are intruding on their privacy.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There has been an ongoing debate topic of the media intruding the lives of celebrities for a long time. Some people support this by making citing that media’s intrusion is the reason for their spotlight, while others disagree on this. I personally think that the intrusion by media is acceptable untill an extent.
Nowadays, media played a major role in the process of making a person a celebrity. Many of these instances occurred because of the media’s involvment in people’s pesonal life. We can take the example of Indian Cricketer, M.S.Dhoni. Dhoni is one of the cricketers who enjoyed fame for a very long time. But it can be said that the media had a major role in this process. When dhoni was gaining popularity among people for various achievements, media made research into his journey to a cricketer. This included his background, hard work, difficulties, etc. When all this information was made public by media it bought dhoni into spotlight which gained him huge fame across India. This is a similar case for with many other celbrities like Kohli, Hardik Pandya.
Although media helped in bringing fame to several people, there times when media was bashed for trying to involve too much into celebrities personal life. These days media monitors every moment of celebrities. Sometimes they create gossips on celebrities to gain publicity. Ranbir Kapoor was one of the victims of the media’s intrusion in celebrities life. When Ranbir Kapoor was enjoying success in film industry media starting following his every moment. Media presented everything including the count of his girlfriends, eating habits, daily schedule, etc. This is not at all acceptable as every person have their own personal matters and would like to keep it for themselves. No one would feel comfortable when his whole life is being known by public.
In conclusion, I agree that the media’s involvement is the reason for many celebrities fame but the media should not be part of someone’s life. Media should start giving respect and space to celebrities for their personal life and get less involved in their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | Gurvi singh | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 56
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Dhoni
...ke the example of Indian Cricketer, M.S.Dhoni. Dhoni is one of the cricketers who enj...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...a's intrusion in celebrities life. When Ranbir Kapoor was enjoying success in f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
...os;s involvement is the reason for many celebrities fame but the media should not be part o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14655172414 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77978441856 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554597701149 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8886708408 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4090909091 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 7.06120827912 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262498837131 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800608118395 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040064077798 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172432975779 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391553669309 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.