Some people think that mothers should spend most of their time raising their children, and therefore the government should support them financially. Do you agree or disagree?
Double income families were virtually unheard of just about 100 years ago. This phenomenon is a symptomatic of the growing distance between family members these days. Whilst there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary; in this essay, I intend to argue that at least a parent, especially mother, should remain at home and take care of their children. Further, governments should offer financial incentives to parents who choose to stay at home. The reasons for my position are as follows.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that dual income families have become the norm in modern societies. Traditionally, one parent assumed the role of the breadwinner, while the other – typically the mother – acted as the homemaker. In this day and age, however, many women have become business or professional workers thanks to the efforts of militant feminists. Consequently, many children are growing up in a parentless environment. Little wonder, then, there are an increasing number of children feeling alienated. This contributes to the increasing distance between family members and ends up with divorce and family breakdown.
In order to resolve the sense of alienation within families, it is essential to address its root causes. Perhaps the most effective method of doing this would be for governments to offer financial incentives to parents who would rather remain at home. Admittedly, such incentives would probably not fully compensate the lost income of couples; however, it could at least soften the hardship of living on a single income and provide an alternative for parents who are willing to remain at home but unable to do so because of financial constraints. Subsidies for women who are housewives are therefore entirely justified.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my perspective that at least a parent – particularly the mother - should stay at home to ensure that their children are well brought up and there are strong bonds between parents and children. It is my belief that though this is a problem of great complexity that no solution is likely in the foreseeable future; however, the measures outlined above constitute a good first step and would be warranted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-29 | Francessca | 67 | view |
- In many countries women no longer feel the need to get married. Some people believe that this is because women are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring.To what extent do you agree? 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
- In many countries, people are moving away from rural areas and towards urban areas.Why do you think that is?What problems can this cause? 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ancial constraints. Subsidies for women who are housewives are therefore entirely justi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, at least, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1643454039 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84415688651 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559888579387 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4509510215 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.058823529 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11784906065 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035358781203 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469662699272 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761867665613 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361232026401 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.