Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response.
The article states that zoos are essential to a modern life and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor explains that activates in this field don’t believe the authors opinion and claim that it is not true. He refutes each of the authors reasons.
First the reading states that animals are treated well in zoos. The professor refutes this point by stating that zoos aren’t treated as pretty as we think. He gives an example of red pandas that found dead in zoo because they poisoned. He highlighted that no safety guard found there for prevented this disaster
Second the article claims that zoos are useful in educational purposes. However, the professor contends that they aren’t so useful in educational aspects. He says that in zoos only visitors attracted in watching animals and showing animals in artificial manner can’t have any educational massage. It just shows, that its ok to use animals for humans’ entertainment.
Third the reading averts that zoos protected endangered specious. The lecture opposes this point by saying that there is a problem with this claim. It states that although one successful example author brings, the success rate of zoos in this part are low and because of small number of animals they keep, animals have to sex with each other and this cause a birth problem.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage. You have 20 minutes to type your response. 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture about save all species that may become extinct, being sure toexplain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading about safeguarding of endangered species . 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...es in this field don't believe the authors opinion and claim that it is not true. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: IT_IS[8]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ducational massage. It just shows, that its ok to use animals for humans' ente...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14027149321 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56824702764 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3036270924 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3846153846 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0667058691571 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270028462114 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0211826251484 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0418846589968 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208224292413 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.