The survey results of the adult education and the percentage of cost contribution for their education
In the given two charts the bar chart represents the survey results of the adult education and the pie chart represents the percentage of cost contribution for their education.
People whoever interested in subject and to gain qualification are almost equal to the remaining five reasons. Where as, helpful of current job. to improve prospeeds of the promotion and enjoy of learning/studying holds of the reasons for study.
Compared to other to be able to change jobs and most people have the least reason to study.
The Pie chart represent the percentage of the cost for education should be shared. Individual alone shares almost half of the total cost compared to the taxpayers and employers contribution.
Therefor, it can be summarized in a way that people who are interested in subject and to gain qualification themselves contributes to their education.
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 56
- Many people believe that it is better to learn something in a group rather than individually.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Transport preferences among young people from different countries 56
- The following bar chart gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries 78
- Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the ones causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...st equal to the remaining five reasons. Where as, helpful of current job. to improve pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...sons. Where as, helpful of current job. to improve prospeeds of the promotion and ...
^^
Line 6, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the total cost compared to the taxpayers and employers contribution. Therefo...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taxpayers and employers contribution. Therefor, it can be summarized in a way ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06237036377 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3446093053 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.875 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322167651407 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11426466518 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152943417644 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155718061846 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160350367258 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.