The line graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets and carbonates drinks between 1978 and 2009.
The line graph illustrates changes in the price of fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets and carbonates drink in the period of 1978-2009.
Overall, the data started around 70 for all three product and there was a steady growth over 31 years. Although the trends were similar in term of a general increase, fresh fruit and vegetables price rose faster than consumer price index while the growing up of sugar and sweet and carbonated drinks price was below consumer price index.
From 1979 to 1983 fresh fruits and vegetables cost varied slightly. These products saw a falling down by around 20 between 1982 and 1983. Throughout the rest of the period, there was a gradual rise in the price of fresh fruits and vegetables. The highest point that fresh fruits and vegetables line reached above 330 in 2008 before showing a reduction slightly in 2009.
between 1980 and 1981 the sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks price grew quicker than other products. The price was above 100 and 95 in 1981 for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks respectively. In the flowing years the data of sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks increased slower than that of fresh fruits and vegetables and consumer price index and touched around 200 and 150 for each.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyen Thi Thom | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... started around 70 for all three product and there was a steady growth over 31 ye...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Between
...howing a reduction slightly in 2009. between 1980 and 1981 the sugar and sweets and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 6.8 338% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90186915888 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36001664709 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9328970313 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 5.23603664747 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.539991236634 0.215688989381 250% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219241932714 0.103423049105 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169536794668 0.0843802449381 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37190894598 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174819375253 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.