Government spending on restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend the money for housing and road development.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that the Government should stop spending on the restoration of old buildings and they should spend the money on housing and road development. Some people concur that authorities should develop infrastructure. However, I quibble from them and propound that they should invest in the progress of our heritage.
Adequate pieces of evidence are obtainable to substantiate the concept of preserving our heritage buildings. The top-notch concrete reason is that by preserving historical buildings we pass our history to our future generations. I think that our children should know their history and learn from it. Another rationale which hauls me to a patron is that our history is our knowledge and power. By destroying them we show our disrespect to our forefathers and their traditions. The rearmost coherent factor to be considered which can not be neglected is revamping ancient property attracts tourism. To uphold my notion, I would quote an instance of “Ranki Vav ” which is prima facie testimony. Ranki Vav is a stepwell situated in the town of Patan in Gujarat. Before ten years, no one known about this heritage site. Our Prime minister, Mr. Narendra Modi has shown interest in developing Ranki Vav as a tourist place. Gujarat government’s preserves this Ranki Vav and now become the most popular visitors' destination in Gujarat. This brings more money, thus improves the lives of people over there. This money could be used to preserve and renovate such buildings.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So the public, in general, tend to distinguish that authorities should invest money on infrastructure development which has multifarious reasons. To commence with some people deem that due to the migration of people from countrysides and population expansion, there is a huge demand for housing development. But I believe that there is a huge space required for colony development and authorities may need to cut trees and which in turn harm to our environment. Withal they also uphold that roads are become very narrow these days due to traffic congestion and the quality of roads should be improved.
In recapitulation, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting on preserving old buildings. However, it’s contrary can be overlooked or controlled. I firmly agree with the given statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-22 | akashpanchal9 | 92 | view |
- It is better for young to get advice from older people than young people Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people prefer to live in hot climates,whereas others love the lifestyle in countries with cold climates. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 84
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 61
- Your friend has just moved to a new house Write a letter to your friend and let him know about the gift that you have prepared for him her In your letter you should describe the gift tell how it will be delivered explain why you chose it
- Government spending on restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped Instead they should spend the money for housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1016, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...nki Vav and now become the most popular visitors destination in Gujarat. This brings mor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, well, i think, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30256410256 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01500084772 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5693571574 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24006657057 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615363088674 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10632119119 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179204712192 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150127938847 0.056905535591 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.