The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country.
Given is a line graph providing information about survey results concerning the motivations behind locating to the capital city of a specific country over fifteen years. Measures are shown in thousands.
A brief analysis of the graph reveals that while all four categories experienced an increase over the given period, the figure for employment saw a marginal decrease after 2010.
Employment was the most cardinal reasons for all years, surging dramatically from just above 60000 in 2000 to approximately 85000 in 2005, then it saw another significant rise and peaked at somewhere in the vicinity of 91000 in 2010. However, this reason for moving to the capital city dropped to slightly under 90 thousand before 2015. The second reason stood study. For the first five years, it doubled from around 25 thousand. This was followed by a moderate growth to about 55000 in 2010 before soaring considerably to the same level of employment in last year.
Two remained reasons, namely friend/family and adventure accounted for 10000 in 2000. Although the figure for the latter saw a constant and stable climb to around 15000 in 2015, there was a gradual increase to a little more than 20 thousand in 2010 for the former. Nonetheless, the family/friends reason plateaued finally.
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 84
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 78
- The line chart below shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city of a particular country 85
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 73
- Some observers say that police officers should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14423076923 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76105564132 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644230769231 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.0263773562 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2727272727 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108578480031 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445629813998 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633402326236 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066913527674 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635652553995 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.