The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagrams illustrate how many percentage of reason why people commute by car or cycling to work. Overalls, health and fitness, less pollutions are two main reasons for cycling to work. While, the volume of people who drive to work are prefer selecting comfort and distance as the largest sector.

it can be clearly seen from the pie chart, it provided health and fitness, less pollution has been received a great deal of people who cycling to work. Therefore, these options ranked first, at 30% and higher as twice than the parking problem. Meanwhile, other reasons are the least selected of people travel to work by bicycle with 12%, 13% for faster and no cost.

In the other hand, the percentage of reason by people tend to choose ca to work for comfort is occupied at 40%. Instead of comforting, distance is the second option for people driving to work, at 21%. In contrast, saving time for travel, need space has the same number, stood at 14%. Finally, the least percentage is 11% account for safeness.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-28 Lê Phạm Nhật Quỳnh 78 view
2019-09-24 dlswife 78 view
2019-09-13 Bao Linh Le 56 view
2019-08-31 Sai sushma 73 view
2019-08-29 mango31799 78 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
The diagrams illustrate how many percentage of reason why people commute by car or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun pollutions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... to work. Overalls, health and fitness, less pollutions are two main reasons for cyc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nd distance as the largest sector. it can be clearly seen from the pie chart,...
^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...options ranked first, at 30% and higher as twice than the parking problem. Meanwhi...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as twice 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...anked first, at 30% and higher as twice than the parking problem. Meanwhile, other r...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79545454545 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34872921505 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619318181818 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9699812265 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.4 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221369649259 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911757644514 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669909230165 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160739972933 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556900765968 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.