The pie charts show percentage of working adults spent time on different activities.
The two pie charts show the time spending by working adults in various activities in particular nation in the year 1958 and 2008.
We can see that work is most prefered by people. In 1958, 33% people spent time on work, but this figure increased to 42% in 2008. During the same five decades, as an increased number of people chose to relax at home, we can see that numbers went from 8% to 13%. Throughout the years, sleeping was second choice of people, but numbers slightly declined from 32% to 25%.
However, In 1958 only 2% people accounted for travel to work, but in 2008 more people interested to work at different places and number goes to 8%. While 19% people love to going out with family and friends remained only 6% in 2008. People show similar interest in playing sports or other interest in last 50 years. In 1958 6% individuals play sports and do other activities and numbers increased to 8% in 2008.
According to the data working and sleeping are the top prorities of the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | Sarwan1996 | 78 | view |
- It has become easier and become affordable for people to travel other countries. Do you think it is positive and negative development? 56
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sector's contribution to economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 73
- Demand for food is increasing 56
- Hahh 11
- Reasons to join college 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The two pie charts show the time spending by working adults in vario...
^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... travel to work, but in 2008 more people interested to work at different places a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56111111111 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29610512944 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7861077605 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192651600666 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788315196865 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993772324936 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138171456773 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110968591245 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.