Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
The topic here raises a very controversial topic of whether scandals are useful or not. Indisputably, the word scandal has a very negative ring to it, presented to us in a negative way often following a considerable amount of chaos. Nevertheless, scandals also often enlighten many minds, challenging the way we work, think or see the world around us. Therefore, scandals can really provoke the thought process of many, galvanizing the change in society in a way many leaders can not, through their words.
To begin with, in a world where most of the population belongs to the working class minding their own quotidian life, people tend not to pay more attention to the hypothetical problem/scare about which a reformer or a speaker trying to warn. For example, before the egregious 9/11 attacks, a normal American was not bothered much about how much secure airports were or did not care much about terrorism in general. Before the attacks, the security at the airports was minimal, allowing everyone-even non-travelers to go till the boarding gates. As detrimental as the 9/11 attacks were, but at least we as a society became aware of the fact we do lack in some areas and need to work on it. Even though it was not the case that there were not any telltale signs present with respect to airport security but the attacks made everyone actually work on it without any further procrastination and uniting pro and anti-security groups.
Furthermore, there are many topics in the society which many people are not interested in/comfortable talking about, scandals usually help to talk about such topics. To illustrate, let us look at the example of the illustrious Anita Hill case. Before this incident, there was not much awareness about ethics or decorum and consequences when not followed the same. After these scandals, we were forced to think if it was fair?, The way investigation was carried out, was it fair to assassinate justice-seeking victim's character? Are law and order only applies to ordinary people? Scandals like Watergate made us ask questions like is commander-in-chief is above the law? Both common sense and evidence have told us that every such scandal brought a reform with it in the way we think and handle the problem.
Admittedly, it is true that these scandals often enter our life as major aberrations and lead to chaos erupting normalcy. In addition, some of the scandals bring not only chaos but grief and a heavy price that we as a society need to pay. However, as history has taught us, such incidents also helped human beings to adapt to the changing time to make a better society for further generations to come.
In conclusion, although scandals may feel unnecessary, chaotic and painful to witness, always helps us to evolve as a society, more open and more attentive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ry negative ring to it, presented to us in a negative way often following a considerable amount o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o chaos erupting normalcy. In addition, some of the scandals bring not only chaos but grief...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, talking about, it is true, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95991561181 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84964249594 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565400843882 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0830500293 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.55 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.21951772744 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134893951283 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393899470946 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422738829243 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693049987901 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338937286534 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.