Instead of asking the government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is of great significance for many people to receive college education since that can make it easier for them to find employment. Those who are in favour of the government increasing investment in university education hold that some students are unable to enter university due to high tuition fees. My view is that students should be the ones who pay their tuition, but those who come from less well-off families should be provided with financial support.
One of the reasons why I believe students should pay their own tuition fees is that they would work harder and cherish the precious opportunities to learn if they do so. This is because they will know that the costs of university education are high by paying the fees themselves, hence they will work harder to do all the assignments, pass the exams, and complete a degree on time. On the contrary, if the government bears the costs, many students would take it for granted and fail exams from time to time.
Another advantage of students covering their own tuitions is that the burden on the government could be lightened and as a result, more money could be allocated to finance primary and secondary education, which helps to eliminate illiteracy and enables more young people to attend universities. What’s more, the government would be able to provide subsidies for students pursuing post-graduate degrees, who contribute to technological innovation.
However, I also hold that students from low-income families should be exempted from tuitions. Only by doing so can these youngsters be encouraged to go to universities, acquire knowledge, hone their skills, and finally get a decent job. This is an effective way to close the wealth gap and build a fair society as well. By contrast, if these students have to pay tuition fees themselves, they may drop out of university, thereby losing the opportunity to explore their potentials.
In conclusion, the government should provide financial supports in accordance with students’ needs to make sure they are given the chance to receive an education. I am of the opinion that while disadvantaged students should be granted free education, it is impractical to abolish tuition fees altogether.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | J a Hermione | 84 | view |
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 55
- The table shows the amount of waste produced by different countries in 1980, 1990, 2000. 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The chart shows how urban refuse is assorted for recycling. 84
- The chart below contains information provided by Australia s tertiary institutions about the percentage of male and female students who enrolled in different subjects in 1995 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, may, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17679558011 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91178697769 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2532501776 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279946275215 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960538614557 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539976538611 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158850904966 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511009876673 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.