Some people think that the design of buildings has affect either positively or negatively on where people work and live To what extent you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people think that the design of buildings has affect, either positively or negatively, on where people work and live. To what extent you agree or disagree.

In this contemporary era, numerous people around the world are increasingly affected by the design of the buildings. While buildings constructed with good design ultimately bring positive vibe from employees, poor design may hamper thought process and less productivity. Even though it is a matter of discussion, I tend to believe that better design impact workplace and life positively.

Firstly, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion. The conspicuous one is that work at a suitable living place with a better design not only fetch creative thoughts but also help people to motivate themselves. For example, employees at Microsoft created software which is unique to their architecture. Apparently, the Company can stand in a good sted and dedicate the credit to the design of that building.

On the other hand, work in poor design buildings is demotivating and cause laziness among employees. So the Organization productivity may not meet the target which brings more chaos entire society. For example, Polaris lost its position in the share market due to negative caused by building to workers. Hence it is evident why the workplace should be built with good design to bring more positive output.

In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of good design buildings at the workplace are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-03 Rish 63 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Rish :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...life positively. Firstly, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion. The c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...negative caused by building to workers. Hence it is evident why the workplace should ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, while, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14798206278 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78321123075 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627802690583 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1891522486 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196924586751 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066036343901 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539616333716 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112187316875 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393781132771 0.0609392437508 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.