Some people think that real life skills like cooking, housekeeping and gardening should be included in the curriculum as compulsory subjects? Do you agree or disagree? Explain your opinion, using specific reasons and details.
In order to survive, cooking, housekeeping and gardening are the most essential part for every person’s life. Few people believe that these crucial real life skills are one of the most key part which must be included in regular syllabus as a mandatory subjects. This essay will provide detailed overview of my opinion whether I agree on the same or not and also showcase few valid examples to support my views.
In my opinion, I agree that life lessons are necessary to support oneself during any emergency. Firstly, there are some educational organizations which accepts such subjects as obligatory students are bound to learn them just like other subjects. This may help them in future numerous ways. For example, Ramakrishna Mission is following the same concept since it was founded. According to this institution, having knowledge about these household activities provide them a different view. Secondly, these studies are not only provide an another view but also teach one how to manage regular domestic works along with work life. As an example, we often face various difficulties during work life. Mostly, people are unable to manage both lives together. In order to prioritize the work, we don’t get time for gardening or cooking or cleaning house.
It is always recommended that one should keep up balance. Otherwise, we will not have time to cook. Our house also needs attention to get clean regular basis or weekly basis. Having a mandatory section for these subjects increase the awareness as well as time management capability from the very early days of one’s life.
To summarized, common or regular homemaker job task is recommended to all educational institute to keep it as compulsory to let the youngsters how to manage all of them in even manner during busy life style.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | SharmisthaNaskar | 70 | view |
- Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- In many professional sports there is an increase in the number of athletes using banned substances to improve their performance What are the causes of the phenomenon and what are some of the possible solutions 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 56
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 89
- All over the world, societies are facing a growing problem with obesity. This problem affects both children and adults.What are the reasons for this rise in obesity? How could it be tackled? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivities provide them a different view. Secondly, these studies are not only pro...
^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a view' or 'another view'.
Suggestion: a view; another view
...dly, these studies are not only provide an another view but also teach one how to manage regula...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13131313131 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69399828745 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5960145165 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6470588235 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152611363727 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432125077825 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433256204337 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868466225706 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549649615271 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.