The best way to teach — whether as an educator, employer, or parent — is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The topic raises a contreversial issue of weather the best way to teach is by praising the positive actions only or not. Indisputably, praising is a good way of motivating students to make them enthusiastic about learning. Nevertheless, only appretiations for their deeds might result negatively by making them huaghty. Thus, I would disagee with the argument that prasing positive actions only is a good way for education and would argue that one should also get to know the wrongs which they do, so that they can improve themseleves. I would elaborate upon the claim by giving two reasons in my subsequent essay.
Firstly, only approbations will never let a student or kid know their misktake. In addition, it will eventually dilude their understanding as they will always know the half-truths. An expercience from my life can be a compelling example for this agrument. WhenI was a kid, my parents never pointed out the mistakes which I have been doing in my drawings. They always appreciated whatever I created. This made me feel pretty confident about my drawings. After few years, I participated in a drawing competition, where I realised the flaws of my painting which were never pointed out to me, so that I could have improved upon them. Consequently, it made me realise that if my parents would have told me my mistakes, I would have gotten a chance to imporve upon them. Thus, I feel it is good to point out mistakes as well.
Secondly, by not letting someone know of their faults can result in making them arrogant or proudy of their skillsets. For instance, if I cook a dish, assumingly pasta, and it had various flaws like less salt, uncompletle cooked vegetables etc.. If I get appreciations for this dish without getting to know my faults, firstly I will never be able to improve and secondly I will get over-confident about the pasta I cook, which is actully not good.
Admittedly, appreciating someone is a good way of inspiring the one to strive for better. But there is little evidence to prove the claim that its a best way of learning. Nonetheless, only positive comments and no truth can do more harm than good.
In sum, although there can be instances when appreciation is more required than pointing out mistakes. However from the perspective of an educator, parents or employer, one needs to comment on the wrong-doings so that the learner can get the chance to improve. In fact, it is correctly said that our mistakes are our best teacher.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | olaelamin | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | NidhiKalani | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | jorgejacs12 | 50 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | greawyky | 50 | view |
- Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 50
- younger people enjoy life better than older people do. 70
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 58
- Archaeologists have long thought that an artifact called the pemchint was used by Dodecan people solely as a musical instrument Pemchints consist of hollowed pieces of bone shell or wood that are tied together with long straps When whirled in the air the 56
- Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 34
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had told'?
Suggestion: had told
..., it made me realise that if my parents would have told me my mistakes, I would have gotten a c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'knows'.
Suggestion: knows
.... Secondly, by not letting someone know of their faults can result in making th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... salt, uncompletle cooked vegetables etc.. If I get appreciations for this dish wi...
^^
Line 13, column 144, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...little evidence to prove the claim that its a best way of learning. Nonetheless, on...
^^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...le evidence to prove the claim that its a best way of learning. Nonetheless, only...
^
Line 17, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...re required than pointing out mistakes. However from the perspective of an educator, pa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, i feel, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84941176471 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86388416769 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4409508184 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6086956522 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4782608696 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82608695652 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126275128378 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375846984946 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445922757838 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768769465577 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487795261496 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.