TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him.
The article states that one painting of women's face which is known to attribute the famous painter Rembrandt could not be worked by him and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor of the lecture explains that the original painting is done by Rembrandt and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that there is something problems with the dressing of the women are painting. The professor refutes this point by stating that after analyzing the painting, the painting is adulterated by some persons to increase its values. They did some overprinting after 100 years of the original print. That's why it looks more luminous and makes a false impression.
Second, the article posits that the combination of light and shadow was not like to Rembrandt because he was the master of this. However, the lecture contends that the light and shadow might not look like as Rembrandt because it's not the original printing of him. In the original painting, the color was simple and less light reflected in the face. So, main printing was like the style of Rembrandt.
Finally, the reading avers that the painting was painted on several pieces of wood which are contradicted with Rembrandt works. The lecture opposes this point by saying this woods also glued by some others to make a copy of the painting. The main painting was painted on a single wood which is much like to Rembrandt works. So, after investing and analyzing the painting, it can be implied that the original painting was done by the great painter Rembrandt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | f.jafary66@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | sandeshbhandari2 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | dipalip | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | shingwa | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Suthasith | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TOEFL T P O 12 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 66
- Tpo 38In 1995 a microscopic fungus called Phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves with 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... after 100 years of the original print. Thats why it looks more luminous and makes a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92775665399 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44406553045 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486692015209 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9927106112 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5714285714 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451005608031 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168319137581 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124457892788 0.0662205650399 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277207447525 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128570683292 0.0443174109184 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.