Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, most people are looking, in their relationship, for a partner who tells the truth in any circumstances. I agree with the statement that always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.
Firstly, trust is one of the most crucial elements of any relationship. Human beings are social animals who live together and communicate with each other. Furthermore, the trust would make a relationship stronger in such an environment, so it became a vital need for a good relationship. Like an instinct of being safe, because of the compelling structure of our population, people tend to find the ones who are trustworthy as a partner. Moreover, trust comes by always telling the truth whether it would disappoint the partner in any relationship. In fact, in the long-term, their relationship would endure against break ups.
Secondly, always telling the truth would help people to get to know each other. The enormous amount of the arguments results in between people who cannot understand each other because they don't always tell the truth. If people would stop telling lie, indeed always telling the truth, relationships become loveable and trusted. Besides, the number of fights between two or more people would decrease remarkably, where regard is the main medium of the conversations.
Finally, people should always tell the truth in any relationship between them due to the reasons mentioned. Since trust is the most vital consideration in a relationship, human-beings need to trust each other to live in a social environment. Additionally, it would decrease the number of arguments in relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
- TPO19.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. 76
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which do you agree with? 80
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
- TPO 14- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- T P O-06 - Integrated Writing Task Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is speci 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 190, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nnot understand each other because they dont always tell the truth. If people would...
^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey dont always tell the truth. If people would stop telling lie, indeed always te...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 261.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33716475096 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12033624627 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513409961686 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3478905544 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8666666667 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282692721091 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12476987202 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13322490549 0.0737576698707 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224508584093 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109187849175 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.