Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
Although many countries in the world are trying their best to conserve endangered animals especially wild animals, some people argue that protecting them is pointless as they think there are not enough places for wild animals. Personally, I extremely disagree this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to believe that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not think that our planet just exists for humans and there is also no persuasive reason for us to let animals die out. Besides, it is unnecessary to exploit every metre of land in order to feed and build houses because the fact that extinction is happening a thousand times more quickly because of humans by hunting, overharvesting. In addtion, there is a variety of spaces for us to live with animals together and this should be goal of humans.
Furthermore, I would say that I also disagree that protecting animals is a waste of resources. If we do not keep and protect the natural habitat of wildlife animals, we have to pag dearly for our actions and it is far more the costs of conservation. For instance, a lot of medicines have been devired from the chemicals which are produced by animals. Then, these medicines are used to cure many health conditions such as heart diseases, disorders and other illnesses. By protecting wild animals and maintaining a healthy ecological balance, animals should be treated as important as humans.
In conclusion, I believe we should do everything in order to protect wild animals and also protect our ecological balance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | maiphuong656594 | 56 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 56
- In many cities, the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweight the drawbacks? 67
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom.Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks? 78
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom Do the benefits of increased security outweight the drawbacks 96
- In many cities, the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweight the drawbacks? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Although many countries in the world are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xtremely disagree this point of view. In my opinion, it is absurd to believe t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...ith animals together and this should be goal of humans. Furthermore...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er and this should be goal of humans. Furthermore, I would say that I also dis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be treated as important as humans. In conclusion, I believe we should do ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8783269962 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75943481085 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555133079848 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5016812568 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.916666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300312365171 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112303206553 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099554888443 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176794512852 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148893408563 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.