The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Acknowledging and praising the positives is surely the best way to teach one. This motivates an individual to work harder and do better, but it doesn’t help if the same person doesn’t know his/her weaknesses and work towards to overcome. While it is essential to nudge people about what they are good at, but it is also important to make them realize their negatives.
For instance, take a technical developer. He is punctual and dedicated, goes office on time, attends meetings without any delay, helps colleagues, finishes the assigned objects within a given timeframe and with utmost quality. During the appreciation time of the year, if he gets an appraisal either in the form of awards or compensation hike, he would feel good about his hard work. It pushes him to work on his positives further to learn more and do better. This example illustrates that it is important to elevate the positives in a person and praise.
Furthermore, the claim assumes that ignoring the drawbacks is an effective method of teaching. But, in my opinion, it could make people ignorant and headstrong and make them think that they are the most intelligent persons in the room, which leaves no chance for progression and improvement. For example, take a professor who has a Ph.D. in the subject he teaches but lacks in the methods of teaching. If nobody said anything to him about this, he would think that he is doing a great job and never know that his teaching methods are not effective. By letting him know this, he could improve his skills and be better at this job. So, it is essential to let a person know about his negatives which help him to overcome the negative points.
In conclusion, while it is good to praise positive actions, ignoring the negative ones are damaging. Knowing both sides and working on them are as important as each to a person to learn and improve.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-18 | Ulka1999 | 50 | view |
2019-11-20 | Faisal Injamam | 50 | view |
2019-11-02 | rkalita8 | 33 | view |
2019-09-11 | swathi3pet | 50 | view |
2019-08-07 | sunandaroy | 50 | view |
- "As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate." 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 50
- The director of the International Health Foundation recently released this announcement:"A new medical test that allows the early detection of a particular disease will prevent the deaths of people all over the world who would otherwise die from the 63
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 63
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Acknowledging and praising the positives...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the positives in a person and praise. Furthermore, the claim assumes that igno...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83076923077 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6843116425 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0735498116 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127640837429 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540858786992 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596679922772 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831680523377 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131887857983 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.