Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? pros and corn?
The importance of the video communication with doctor helps patients to cure any disease, which has always been debatable has sparked upsurged a lots of arguments in favor and against it, thus it has became even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of imitating celebrities has sparked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instruments indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide a well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the video communication with doctor help the patients to cure any disease is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies fact that the advantage. Therefore, it is a vital time to appreciate both the significance of the video communication with the help of doctor for the overall amelioration of society.
However, it has some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing viewpoint. Which has certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the video communication with the doctor help patients to cure any disease? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that disadvantage. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the video communication with the help of doctor cannot be overlooked.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspective about the impact of the video communication with the doctor help patients to cure any disease. While it is evident it is various benefit, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | Jaskaransingh11 | 65 | view |
- advantages or disadvantages of credit card. Do you agree or disagree 72
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children's acts. What is your opinion? support it with personal examples. 55
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, what are the cause of this crucial problem? what are the solutions? 80
- U2U2 PUOEWRIOQ PWUOEWQU9R 98EWQUE2UE PSDU WIOUE9Q8E02828823 JWQOIUE203 IUWOQEQ7E7823 HDWQEWQUUEWEUWQUE JDSADOWI 55
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? pros and cons 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...ays been debatable has sparked upsurged a lots of arguments in favor and against it, t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ts in favor and against it, thus it has became even more controversial. The substantia...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...arked controversy over the potential of this trends is an integral part of society i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'overwhelmed'.
Suggestion: overwhelmed
...opposing viewpoint. Which has certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the video comm...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44150943396 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22571988538 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51320754717 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.394536929 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454803953762 0.242375264174 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178599589002 0.0925447433944 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191958138301 0.071462118173 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320544837386 0.151781067708 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115577685684 0.0609392437508 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.