The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction?
There is a widely-held belief that ordinary course books will never be supplanted by the internet in schools. It appears to me that even though technology has brought us a range of well-known and developed educational materials, there might always be a place for each traditional book in every school's curriculum. This essay deals with this polemical issue and represents a number of convincing reasons for the topic before reaching a conclusion.
For thousands of years, books were the main source of knowledge and have passed precious lessons to us. The first and foremost reason behind the unwavering support of course books is that they are accurately adjusted by experienced pedagogical teachers. By this, I mean that these educators carefully produce the outlines of every syllabus to match the objectives of lessons. Furthermore, by using these contents, either pupils might easily prepare themselves to participate in formal examinations, or teachers would evaluate students by continuous assessments. Also, even though the majority of these books are teacher-led, they encourage children to work on groups, enhancing their teamwork capabilities. Hence, they will make themselves ready for pursuing higher education in prestigious universities.
Admittedly internet could provide a wide range of resources from video lessons to documents which have tutorials, especially for those who seek to do self-study and distance-learning. However, this technology needs a mature volunteer who can discriminate between useful and unsuitable resources, shift information, and assimilate the felicitous knowledge, not a primary student.
In conclusion, it is logical to argue that course books are potential and valuable resources which tend to be an integral part of every school's curriculum; nonetheless, the internet could have benefits if used under supervision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | angellica | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | zakir108 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | javlonbek2708 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Saahaar | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | erfan.mohamadi | 84 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 78
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 87
- The internet will never replace traditional course books in schools. How far do you agree with this prediction? 84
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development You should use your own ideas knowledge and exper 72
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...lace for each traditional book in every schools curriculum. This essay deals with this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...ch tend to be an integral part of every schools curriculum; nonetheless, the internet c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, i mean, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70967741935 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15660540868 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659498207885 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6853291539 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194189192075 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679807709948 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687506234889 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111546958261 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665548877558 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.