The amount of garbage produced by our cities is a big problem for governments around the world. How can this problem be fixed?
Nowadays, waste generation is increasing uncontrollably. Around the globe, governments are finding it difficult to manage and solve the issues generated by rubbish. In my opinion, use of degradable items and better waste management are the main solutions for controlling the garbage.
To begin with, useless items can be controlled by efficiently selecting materials for its manufacture. It means that, the items that seems to be a waste in future needs to be manufactured with degradable and reusable items. For this, companies should take initiatives, such as the use of paper bags and other eco-friendly stuffs to produce the aforementioned items. By doing this, waste accumulation will gradually reduce because, even if they settle, they will be degraded. For instance, studies done by Cochin University reveals that, about 30% of earthworms are getting died every year due to the presence of underground plastic, thereby effective nitrification and digestion of waste is reduced. So, it is advisable to use eco-friendly raw materials for mass production to avoid waste accumulation.
Secondly, policy makers should introduce better waste management system throughout the cities for the effective management of the same. As an initiative, they should conduct several seminars and classes to create awareness on the dangerous issues hidden behind the garbage, thereby developing certain rules, such as, strict use of less micron plastic and fines for those who violates the same, by which authorities can confirm better implementation of laws. Furthermore, officials can consider installing separate cans for collecting recyclable and non-recyclable wastes. Thus, above-mentioned ways should be implemented for better management of wastes.
In summary, waste generation is a never-ending issue, which needs to be tackled by wise selection of degradable materials for manufacturing along with the introduction of planned waste management systems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | basilgeorge70 | 82 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | underscores | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in summary, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74914089347 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19930348698 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604810996564 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0270507336 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152497765837 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574378622733 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290916355315 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865625280339 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318335263389 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.