At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of giving financial support to games and social activities in association with classes and libraries. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely support the idea of giving financial aid to sports and other activities. It is my firm belief that practicing socialism and different sports will improve our mental and physical conditions for a number of reasons and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, participating in various kinds of sports will cast positive impacts in the students’ life. Also recreation is necessary from the daily class schedules and library works. Sports and games serve as both physical and mental exercise. Outdoor games such as football, basketball, badminton are considered beneficial form of exercises. Indoor games like chess, monopoly, cards increase intellectual skills. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. I remember when I was in my school period, I always tried to participate in badminton and chess games. These specific playing tools made me feel strong, healthy and also enhance my thinking capabilities to solve puzzles. I got extreme pleasure by performing these tasks. As a result, a little break from the regular study plan helps me to gather more concentration in the classes. For this reason, I never felt bored in my lecture time and study period as I was completely boosted up physically and mentally.
Secondly, social activities make us gregarious and amiable by improving our characteristics. Arranging different types of social activities like cultural programs, religious festivals, reception programs for the new students etc. will surely increase communication skill. Furthermore, participating in these of events people will get a chance to practice socialism by helping others and showing respect to each other. On the other hand, students also got a platform to get familiar with different cultures. Drawing from my own experience, in my university life I used to attend the cultural programs organized by the cultural committee. Those events helped me a lot to gain knowledge about different traditions which were showed by the representative of various nations. Moreover, I was able to make more friends through the program. It’s certainly clear to see why social activities need support with classes to develop social interaction and other valuable skills.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that sports and social activities should be given equal importance as given to the classes. This is because to make the universities and colleges more sophistically oriented in terms of its education and other activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | SaniyaYesmin | 86 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements.Teachers should not make their social or political views know to the students in the classroom. 76
- Investing in research which may have controversial results 50
- TPO 22 Task 2 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 70
- TPO 18 Task 2 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ive impacts in the students' life. Also recreation is necessary from the daily ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35454545455 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98563710548 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572727272727 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0183954271 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.24 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185676497581 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448657111105 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543549851441 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122352073476 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488214531927 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.