The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
I am totally convinced that traffic these days has increased significantly specially in the big cities. There is no one reason for that. All of us now want to get rid of this enormous congestion on the way to our daily commute. To do that some of us might want to lessen the daily requirements to travel for school work or shopping. As it is a completely impractical solution, I totally disagree with this though. I believe it is not at all possible to cut down all the need to travel rather there are other ways that are more practical and meaningful.
Increasing the usage of public transport is probably the best way to reduce traffic significantly. Now-a-days traffic congestion is mainly caused by private vehicles. A public bus can carry forty to sixty passengers at a time whereas a car taking same space is only capable of carrying four to five persons at most. Hence, usage of public buses would clearly make a difference on congestion reduction. For example, most of the developed countries have improved and saved working hours by using public transports instead of own vehicles. Therefore, government can encourage people to not by own vehicles rather use public transport for their daily transportation.
Better transport system and control can play an important role to undertake the heavy responsibility of reducing traffic jam. The government can Identify the heavy-duty roads and widen them as required. That not only will help to reduce the traffic but also lower the waste of fuel. For example, president of Malaysia, executed this plan as the first step of traffic reduction project. Though at the beginning he received a lot of negative criticism but later he managed to prove his decision was right with an effective result. He also ensured a strict and transparent traffic control system that proven to be successful later.
To sum up, some basic needs of daily travel can be reduced such as by shopping online, working from home or home education. However, other options as mentioned above can be more efficient and practical. So base on that, realistic approaches should be chosen that doesn't cause any inconvenience to our daily life.
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 22
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a negative or positive development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...listic approaches should be chosen that doesnt cause any inconvenience to our daily li...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se any inconvenience to our daily life.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97802197802 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79331170242 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601648351648 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9760182366 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2857142857 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242767004047 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648035180045 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620127711938 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13050629571 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232072192055 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.