Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit
the greatest number of people.
From time immemorial, man has strived to achieve new goals and come up with latest discoveries by means of innovation, dedication and hard work. While some of the findings were by accidental means, few inventions came through nature and others by improving the original ideas. Researchers’ focus was only on finding the solutions of all the problems faced by an individual rather than distinguishing it into the benefit attained by a larger or smaller group. Hence, I strongly believe that the focus should rely on mankind giving equal weightage to relevant problems faced by them.
In the stone age, man found out that rubbing of two stones gave rise to spark, which is the fire used even today for simple task like cooking to the discovery of major nuclear bombs. even though the discovery was by chance, it has led to the benefit of myriad number of people. On the other hand, the invention of flight by Wright brothers, merely by the introspection of nature as to how birds fly, was a major benchmark in the history of mankind, owing to the fact that thousands of miles could be travelled within a short span of time in comparison to the other modes of transport.
Further, in the field of medicine, scientists have discovered many medicines, a panacea for most of the deadly diseases prevalent even today. For example, smallpox was considered lethal as it took away the lives of millions of people around the world. The cure of such a deadly disease has proven to be beneficial to a greater lot. but it does not mean that scientists should focus only on killer diseases like cancer, AIDS, etc. What about the slow poisonous and harmful effect of environmental hazards that we are facing today due to the high level of pollutants in the atmosphere. it cannot be neglected as it is killing us inch by inch and day by day. The problems like stress, anxiety disorder, fatigue, albeit not evident, are draining our energy and will prove to be lethal, if not treated on time. if proper medications are not discovered, then the people living in the current scenario with a heavy work pressure are sure to have a low mortality rate. such pressing issues are the need of the hour, which though not clearly seen, if left unchecked could lead to a disastrous effect.
Nevertheless, research should be conducted in view of the future and accounting for the whole lot of people on earth. For example, advances in the field of science and technology has taken a mammoth size in recent years to check whether life could exist in places apart from the earth. The recent effort taken by the Indians to get details about the moon, using the Chandrayaan spacecraft, although a failure, is a laudable one. Unless efforts are taken by the research individual, we cannot expect our nation to be a successful one in all diverse aspects. examples as this proves that space scientists consider, not only the need of humans but also keep the future in mind.
Thus, to sum, it can be reiterated that, discoveries made need not ascertain the role of greater or lesser number of people. scientists could dedicate their life to yielding success not only in the field of medicine and technology but also in issues relating to the everyday needs of human beings.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars than there are these days 76
- Young People enjoy life more than old people. Do you agree or not? 80
- Technology has made children less creative than they are in past.Agree or disagree? 78
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...trived to achieve new goals and come up with latest discoveries by means of innovation, ded...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...vation, dedication and hard work. While some of the findings were by accidental means, few ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...o the discovery of major nuclear bombs. even though the discovery was by chance, it ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 333, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...oven to be beneficial to a greater lot. but it does not mean that scientists should...
^^^
Line 9, column 585, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... level of pollutants in the atmosphere. it cannot be neglected as it is killing us...
^^
Line 9, column 807, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e to be lethal, if not treated on time. if proper medications are not discovered, ...
^^
Line 9, column 962, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
... are sure to have a low mortality rate. such pressing issues are the need of the hou...
^^^^
Line 13, column 89, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...ew of the future and accounting for the whole lot of people on earth. For example, advanc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 558, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Examples
... successful one in all diverse aspects. examples as this proves that space scientists co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Scientists
... of greater or lesser number of people. scientists could dedicate their life to yielding s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, apart from, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 96.0 58.6224719101 164% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2698.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79218472469 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61559993797 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552397868561 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1803811076 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.304347826 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4782608696 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178735896168 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427304247979 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466151235589 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879570763867 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131926205545 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.