Although it is generally prohibited, corporal punishment persist in many families. Do you think corporal punishment is an acceptable way to regulate children’s behaviors?
During mankind history, punishment, in particular corporal punishment, has been utilized as a prominent way for children’s behavior regulation by either parents or tutors. Despite the increasing demand for children’s corporal punishment eradication, it is still used in many countries. In my opinion, eradication of corporal punishment merits serious consideration.
First of all, young people, who have an accurate picture of the world, are more likely to make mistakes while acquiring experience and becoming well-rounded. Many, if not all, adults show a tendency to instill the appropriate behavior into teenagers by physical punishment. However, this might lead to devastating effect on children’s behavior. Having been punished by parents, children might turn into individuals who lack confidence and self-directness who always seek their parent’s approval.
Secondly, living in today’s hectic life, parents are snowed under with work, spending inadequate time for children’s nurture. Therefore, they tend to use aggressive methods of education as a result of their fatigue and boredom. So vulnerable are some children that they are more likely to imitate their parent’s behavior later in their own life, using aggressiveness to regulate their children’s treatment correspondingly. More importantly, it has been proved by scientists that, in most cases, the inspiration for committing crimes stems from being misbehaved or physically punished by parents in childhood.
Although some families, particularly those from developing countries, insist on corporal punishment as an effectual way for adjusting children’s behavior, this method cannot be appropriate not only because the extent of punishment is hard to control but also because of its detrimental impacts on both individuals and the society.
From what has been discussed above, under no circumstances can corporal punishment be acceptable for children’s behavior regulation. Without an appropriate method of education, not only might children turn into chemicals but also they are at high risk of losing their confidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | razmjooiee.71@gmail.com | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, in particular, as a result, first of all, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01633986928 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4488196345 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.575016205 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336113192942 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120576591587 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875531792976 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20940920949 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841662406894 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.