Modern Technology is now very common in most places. How do you think this has changed the way we work? Do you think there is disadvantage to relying too much on technology?
Innovations in applied science has intense effect in our day to day life especially work place. The globalization of world economies has enhanced the value of information technology.
From stone age to tech age, the ways of working got completely transformed. In earlier days, humans used to do work manually which not only takes huge amount of time, but, also need man power as well. To exemplify, earlier to pass any message to it took few days, but now because of emails and phones it can be done in few minutes. Furthermore, in jobs such as, inventories store it was very difficult to keep the track of availability of materials; many of the times the data was also incorrect, but because of computers data entry has not only become easy; however, the details are also correct.
In contrast, there are many pitfalls as well. Due to increased dependency on automation the manual effort got reduced and people has become lazy; furthermore, the man power required for these purposes also costly. To illustrate, all the machinery which was operated by hands got replaced by machines which has set commands and no manual intervention is required. Therefore, the labour required are skilled and well equipped with knowledge so costly. Additionally, these computerized machines are more prone to hacking. To exemplify, in nuclear power plants all operations are done by computers and if any spy will hack that computer a huge amount of critical information can be leaked and can cause disastrous effects.
To recapitulate, technology has its own benefits and drawbacks. On one hand it has made the work easy whereas on the other it make people more dependent on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | wadhwaaamit4 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...e the work easy whereas on the other it make people more dependent on it.
^^^^
Line 13, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er it make people more dependent on it.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02508960573 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82290775825 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2221291824 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0610937657206 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0204723142897 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262525724901 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378958731161 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288374789044 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.