The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager.
"One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. I predict that modifying showerheads to restrict water flow throughout all twelve buildings in the Sunnyside Towers complex will increase our profits even more dramatically."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
The owner points out that by modifying showerheads in the three apartments. It can save a substantial amount of money for the manager. Therefore, all twelve buildings should the same. Before making this decision, the owner should answer several questions.
First of all, before the water usage readings are available, how could you be sure that less water will be used? Due the low pressure of water, residents might have longer shower times. Low water pressure will make washing down soap and cleaning more difficult. If they have five times longer than their original shower length, the water used might be even more before implementing the shower heads.
Secondly, can the residents change the showerheads' settings? Some clever residents might be able to remove the water restrict device and use the original pressure to clean. They might even apply a pressure amplifier to increase water outflow. Making the water bills more expensive. Thus, the owner should make sure that no residents have changed the setting of the showerheads.
Last but not least, the owner recommends that all building should apply the same method. However, is the owner informed that all twelve building's water pressures are the same? If the first three buildings have higher water pressures that are uncomfortable for shower, restricting water flow might have done the residents a favor. On the other hand, if the other nine buildings have lower pressures already, then restricting one-third of water might cause an outrage among residents. They might leave their apartments next year or sue the owner for scamming them. The cost of the result might be unable to complement the saving of the water bill. Therefore, the owner should investigate whether the water pressure of all their buildings.
In conclusion, the owner must answer the questions mentioned above and provide proof before reporting his proposition to the manager.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Mozzie merona | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | ayush12 | 29 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | asif13 | 63 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | partha159 | 34 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | parinshah2 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow t 63
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals."In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps, a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than 77
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 63
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 50
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 50
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 308 350
No. of Characters: 1562 1500
No. of Different Words: 159 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.189 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.071 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.419 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 41 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.285 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.524 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.543 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The owner points out that by modifying showerheads in the three ap...
^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to remove the water restrict device and use the original pressure to clean. They...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thus, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 308.0 441.139720559 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26298701299 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.511306445 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525974025974 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 705.55239521 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6282258624 57.8364921388 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.1904761905 119.503703932 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167208941636 0.218282227539 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611982477814 0.0743258471296 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408446008441 0.0701772020484 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975835205776 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484504530109 0.0628817314937 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 98.500998004 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 12.3882235529 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.