Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
A hero is a person whom people follow as their aspiration or role model. He/ She is elected or chosen by society and its people because of his/ her qualities and good works for the society. The prompt here claims that in today's time, it is not possible for a society to regard any living person as a hero and the reason attributed to the claim is that the reputation of every person who is famous or is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished. I mostly disagree with the claim for two reasons.
To begin, as the reason in the prompt states, anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will be losing his or her reputation over time. This reason seems too extreme to me. There are many living exampels who are everyday subjected to media and still are role models for a lot of people. For instance, the present prime minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, serves to be a hero of the entire nation by his good doings for the nation and its population. Although, he is daily subjected to media scrutiny, not just of India, of whole world, still he is able to be a hero of billions of people. The reason behind that is, he is not doing anythimg wrong for the society which will diminish his reputation. The above example illustrates that there can be living hero in the society in todays media time also.
Further, it is not necessary for a person to be a celebrity or a known face to become a hero. A person can become famous after he has done a heroic deed. Rather, sometimes with the help of media, one becomes a hero overnight. For Instance, a soldier who no one knew before, became a country's hero by defeating an enemy aircraft in the air combat. He received love and respect of the nation. For me, all the soldiers on the border fighting for the peace and security of the country are heroes of the society and Nation at large. With the above example, we can say that the media not always diminishes a hero’s reputation, it may help in making a less known person hero or the role model overnight.
The reason stated in the prompt does hold merit for some people or 'heroes' but is definitely not true in every case. The most important thing is that if a person has done something wrong in his life, then definitely their repot will be diminished by scrutinizing media. But when there is no black mark present in the character or works done in past by a person, the person will definitely be considered as a hero.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Morienta | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Nico Lingga | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | shivamchug | 54 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Ce 80
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... There are many living exampels who are everyday subjected to media and still are role m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 798, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ero in the society in todays media time also. Further, it is not necessary for ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45879732739 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42057580059 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461024498886 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1309183984 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314477905963 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956195870741 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847484426555 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202145243563 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836746622706 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.