Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
There is a widely discussed topic regarding living in a foreign country where people speak another language. Some might argue that this might result in either detrimental social challenges or practical ones. This essay will discuss that although language barrier might result in difficulties like solitary life, living abroad would have many appealing advantages.
Admittedly, if people decide to migrate to a new country where they do not know their national language, it would contribute to the issue of isolation. By this, I mean that it takes time for people to get used to the new environment in which individuals’ communication patterns are different from migrant’s home country. Moreover, since they are far from their friends and family, they often fail to find new friends because of the language barrier. Hence, these issues undermine their emotional wellbeing and lead to loneliness.
Notwithstanding that, for the majority of people, a new country brings a wide range of advantages. The foremost reason is that people will obtain a new perspective toward the world. Living in a homeland means that people are in accord with its rules, cultures, and even social, economic, and political structures. However, when people migrate, they might encounter new norms and views, starting to seeing the world through the lens of another culture, structure, and values. Thus, it widens people’s vision.
In conclusion, it is true that language seem to be a significant pediment in communication. Nevertheless, it appears to me that the benefits of living overseas outweigh its drawbacks and brings modern insights for people who experience it.
- The chart shows number of foreign students in Canada 71
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK, and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit. 73
- The chart below gives information about world spending and population 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, even so, i mean, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41923076923 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9812307335 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7332879618 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127599982973 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439209650843 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454477111485 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772708726293 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566342991466 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.