Plow in agriculture
The lecture criticizes the plow, thus the points in the lecture challenge points in the reading.
First, according to the lecture the plow increases crops,but does not conserve for the future. The professor discussed alternating farming, which is better. This is contrast with the reading that the plow is a great invention because it makes possible vast surface agriculture.
Second, the lecture state the overuse of the plow damage to the soil. For example professor said it causes erosion by the wind and water. In the following of the lecture professor state dust bowl run of the soil into the lake and river happened while the plow are extremely. This challenges the point in the reading that tilling soil with a plow improves the soil.
Third, the professor mentioned the economic advantage of no till farming. He believed its leads to save fuel and labor costs. However passage state the plow reduces the costs and labor requirements of agriculture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Subjects such as art, music, and drama should be a part of every child's basic education.Use specific reasons and example to support your opinion. 78
- Plow in agriculture 60
- Visual spatial intelligence 68
- Wind energ source 81
- Development plan in the city 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
... to the lecture the plow increases crops,but does not conserve for the future. The p...
^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...its leads to save fuel and labor costs. However passage state the plow reduces the cost...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 1373.03311258 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 159.0 270.72406181 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5451890738 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 145.348785872 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578616352201 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 419.366225166 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3052216952 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.9090909091 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206346589532 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812353526083 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628738446044 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12691678925 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315129211735 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.