Mark test for interpret chimps behaviors
In an overview, in this speech and reading discussed arguments about mark test and interpret the result of these experiments with chimpanzees. deliberately, the essential indications in the lecture cast doubt on the fundamental points in the reading.
First of all, the lecture states that the mark test was repeated many times, but some of this result were inconsistent. However, this is contrasts the topic in reading that the mark test has repeatedly demonstrated that chimpanzees recognize themselves in a mirror.
Furthermore, about the chimpanzees perform very same behaviors routinely. well, lecture mentions that all chimpanzees touch their heads and faces a lot, with or without existence the mirror. Although, this is opposite with clues of the reading that clearly asserts chimps touched their faces and heads more when the mirror was present.
Finally and importantly, the lecture explain that self-grooming in chimpanzees is a <span style="color: rgb(33, 33, 33); font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium; white-space: normal;">conscious</span> social behavior and they use them when to responses to other chimpanzees presence. This challenges the content in the text that chimpanzees would groom themselves because they recognized their own image in a mirror.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-06 | hosseindehnamaki | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Deliberately
... of these experiments with chimpanzees. deliberately, the essential indications in the lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Well
... perform very same behaviors routinely. well, lecture mentions that all chimpanzees ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ads more when the mirror was present. Finally and importantly, the lecture explain th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chimpanzees'' or 'chimpanzee's'?
Suggestion: chimpanzees'; chimpanzee's
...hey use them when to responses to other chimpanzees presence. This challenges the content i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79057591623 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59495670544 2.5805825403 139% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607329842932 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1709498834 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162705964724 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667114321843 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637384717511 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987226573817 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056483549922 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.2367328918 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.