To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The mentioned issue invokes a thinking process on whether the major cities alone can yield enough information for the societies they represent. From the historical evidences, we know that many ancient civilizations like Ancient Egypt, Roman, Indus valley etc existed and flourished in their times. However, as the whole world moved toward the modern era, these civilizations were not able to cope with the changes and they dissolved; with only a few generations of such societies left today in their major cities. So, I couldn’t agree completely that analysis of major cities alone enough to understand the existing societies.
First, in order to understand a society, we should analyse the idiosyncratic norms of a society such its religious beliefs and their cultural traditions: cuisine, language, traditional dress etc. However, as the world has entered a modern era, each country is moving towards the goal of development. Within any country, the major cities are being developed in the field of economy and technology. For example, Mumbai, a major city in the state of Maharastra India, was popularly known for the “Maratha” civilization in the past. Now, Mumbai has become the Financial, entertainment and commercial capital of India. People from all over world come to Mumbai to do business, start-ups, invest, study etc. and hence a centre for various cultures. The cultural diversity of Mumbai can be understood by the L&T company, which was started by two Danish Engineers, Larsen and Toubro in the field of designing engineering equipments. Also, universities like the “Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai” enjoys a great diversity of students from all over the world which can practice their own religion and their culture according to their will. The above example demonstrates that Mumbai has a great diversity of culture from different societies which are co-existing together and hence Mumbai, a major city alone cannot characterise the idiosyncratic “Maratha” civilization of Maharashtra.
On the other hand, most small towns and cities within a state are preserving the integrity of their unique civilizations. Bishnoi village, a small town in the city Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India fits perfectly in this context. In today’s modern world, people in Bishnoi village still wear their traditional dresses like dhoti and kurta, practices hand-weaving for carpet making, grows opium for religious purposes and deifies the flora and fauna of their village; which one may not be able to discover in major cities like Mumbai where people prefer western dressing, use machine-made carpets, disrupts the natural food web of animals and plants in the name of development like for making roads, hotels, statues etc. The Bishnoi village people believe that it is their duty to practice the mentioned activities and to preserve their society’s idiosyncratic culture. From this example we can get a detailed information of a society by investigating such small towns and villages since these villages kept themselves apart from the modern idea of development which tries to unite the existing societies and thus uniqueness of any culture is lost.
In the conclusion, we can say that we need to analyse the small towns or cities within a state to understand the characteristics of a society. Major cities can give the big idea of economy, development etc but such cities have now become a hub of diverse cultures and thus idiosyncrasy of a society is difficult to observe in such cities. Hence, a focus on small towns and cities will yield better information on any society which the town represents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | snowsss | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | nikhil40507 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | satyam63 | 50 | view |
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 78
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes. Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society.Describe advantages and disadvantages of death penalty and give your opinion.Write atleast 250 words 67
- Immigration has a major impact on the society.What are the main reasons of immigration?To what consequences can it lead?Write atleast 250 words 84
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... any society which the town represents.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, thus, apart from, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3094.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 576.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37152777778 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89897948557 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03433087675 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 973.8 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.1575636013 60.3974514979 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102630045605 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338791183466 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233277279775 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702012246256 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00916308290642 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.