Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Old friends are a worthy treasure which a person can obtain in life. Although we should be open-minded for new friends, but I believe friendships that last for long time are more stronger and priceless. Reasons make me decide this notion consist of you are going to know people well over time, relations which endure so many years are unbroken and you make unforgettable memories with your old friends through years.
There is a time matter to acknowledge the truth of a relation among people. You acquaint with new people every day almost. You should spend time to be familiar with strangers and decide to start a friendship with them or not. As you become older this is going to be more tough and unfavorable to you, so you should stick to your good old friends. To conclude, making new friends is always hard and will not replace the goodness of old friends.
Long-lasting friendships are hard to broke and unbetrayal. When someone is placid and happy with his friends there is no logical reason to try change them. By searching for new people, not only do you upset your old friends but new mates also start to have a doubt on your loyalty. To sum up, if someone use his wisdom to arrange his friends, he will come up to stand with great old friends is the best option.
The most gratifying part of a friendship is memories. Memories had been built through years are priceless goals of a friendship. You would never forget a simple delightful moment with your friends, since it is better to remember those in tranquility and do not regret missing old friends. You built a history all together and a good story continues with all its characters. By and large, a man should put effort to keep on make memories with his proved pals instead of searching for new strangers.
Old friends are the aid of your hard-times through obstacles. You know one another better than anyone else, so you do not have a better remedy for fulfill your lonely times. When a football team has a winner formation, on no account should the coach change that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | sonyeoso | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Muggle1313 | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 75 | view |
- Internet 76
- Altruism 78
- Truth 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...friendships that last for long time are more stronger and priceless. Reasons make me decide t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
... on your loyalty. To sum up, if someone use his wisdom to arrange his friends, he w...
^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with all its characters. By and large, a man should put effort to keep on make ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, you know, by and large, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63360881543 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46802130725 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542699724518 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3739761772 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36285237566 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104184387759 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799028036638 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217536298688 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030629329695 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.