TPO 43
Both of the provided materials are discussing Agnostids' natural food. The reading states three possibilities of what these primitive creatures might have been feeding on, whereas the lecture refutes each of the author's points and bolds out their weaknesses.
First, the reading attributes Agnostides as predators, as if they prey on smaller marine creatures. However, the professor opposes this point by contrasting a normal predator vision and Agnostides' lack of such an organism. In other words, predators have to have powerful eyesight to catch their prey. But it seems like Agnostides are not blessed with such a vision or anything that allows them to prey on other living things. With this in mind, the author's first point is overturned.
Second, the reading assumes that Agnostides were sea-floor dwellers, as their natural habitat relies on the bottom of the oceans. Nonetheless, the lecturer contends that sea-floor creatures lack the ability to move fast, and thus, they occupy a limited range of places, mostly their origins. On the other hand, Agnostides different many species have been located in many different areas around the globe. Since they had to move fast in order to be this distributed, it is unlikely for these creatures to be sea-floor dwellers. Again, the second point of the passage is surpassed.
Third, the reading states that Agnostides were natural parasites, creatures that live on other animals and feed on their food or remnants. Conversely, the professor contends by mentioning that parasites' populations are usually small and limited for a large population of these dependant creatures will extinguish their hosts. Notwithstanding, Agnostides' population's size was enormous since researchers have found many different fossils attributable to them. Thus, the possibility of their being parasites is weakened, as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 367, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...erent many species have been located in many different areas around the globe. Since they had ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 414, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s enormous since researchers have found many different fossils attributable to them. Thus, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, third, thus, well, whereas, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48263888889 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81128874809 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565972222222 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9664020113 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344115727386 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1180964175 0.0996497079465 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757438168193 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211271442003 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535965475607 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.