The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 200 and projections for 2050.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the number of populations divided by ages in two countries, i.e. Yemen and Italy in 2000 and expectation for 2050. Overall, there were noticeable different between the number of junior (0-14 years) and senior citizens of both Yemen and Italy in the given period where the children rates is considered to be higher in Yemen, while Italy showed bigger portion in 60+ years citizens.
First and foremost, in 2000, the rates of 0-14 year citizens were relatively higher in Yemen that is exactly a half percent of the average. By contrast, Italian children shared only minor portion of the population, i.e. approximately 14.3%. Research suggested that the number of children of both nations is expected to decline in 2050 to about 37% in Yemen and 11.5% in Italy.
In regards to Italian, it showed that the majority of them were 15-50 years old that is about 60.6% in 2000. Contrary, the 60+ years old individuals shared only few percent, i.e. just twice above the children populations. It was predicted that both percentages will grow oppositely in 2050 where the 60+ will increase rapidly and the 15-59 will decrease although slightly. The Yemenians however, it is predicted that the rates of it 15-59 years people will experience noticeable grow from just beneath a half percent of the average in 2000 to 56,3% in 2050. Meanwhile, the 60+ shared only minor percentage in 2000 and will remain stable in 2050.
- New Parents should attend parenting classes to learn how to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on the cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010. 56
- Most Employers do job interviews before offering a position to a person. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? What is the best method of choosing employees in your opinion? 56
- The graph bellow shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in United Kingdom in 1970, 1990 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Formal exams are used to assess student at the end of each semester in many countries. Why are these exams used by school and universities? What are other types of assessments are possible? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...out 37% in Yemen and 11.5% in Italy. In regards to Italian, it showed that the majority of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92561983471 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52097613531 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495867768595 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3678612304 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112296108404 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507868780749 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659537870871 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916445004104 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708870606143 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.