Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people would subscribe the view that politicians are responsible for protecting the environment. However, I am of the opinion that both governments and citizens should play their role in solving environmental problems as will be discussed.
On the one hand, the executive branch has an important duty in solving problems related to the environment. Firstly, the government has the power to enact laws to stop individual harmful acts as well as impose financial penalties on companies over-exploiting environment. For example, developed countries like Poland and Norway introduced green-tax policy which return tax for enterprises reducing emissions and toxic waste, which encourages companies protect our living environment. Secondly, only the authorities are able to have enough funding to deal with serious environmental problems. Extreme weather events like global warming, prolonged droughts, violent storms require much efforts in term of finance from cooperation of politicians and large environmental organizations to be effectively addressed.
On the other hand, the environment can not be fully protected without the contribution of individuals. Initially, without citizens’ law-respecting and following, governmental intervention hardly works. For instance, despite the number of laws established, in Vietnam it can be seen that numerous wastes on street, lake and the gas emissions from vehicles is increasing especially in big cities. Furthermore, individuals can help in various ways namely recycling more, buying more energy-efficient household items or planting more trees in their gardens. They can also start volunteering campaigns to ask other individuals and organizations to save environment.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I concur that protecting the environment is the obligation of both politicians and individuals.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
- Dinosaurs were endotherms during the fossil period. 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have a job that you enjoy to do rather than a job with high income.Give reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has. 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...longed droughts, violent storms require much efforts in term of finance from coopera...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 268.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03731343284 4.8611393121 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3969633649 2.67179642975 127% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.660447761194 0.524837075471 126% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2583145646 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.461538462 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 5.45110844103 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161549296182 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564733909625 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418207599167 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880144071172 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344751038272 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 10.9000537634 163% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.01818996416 128% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.