The media should include more stories which report good news rather than bad news.
To what extent you agree or disagree?
It is common to see negative news on media channels these days. For this reason, many people hold the view that the media should cover more good news instead of bad news. I personally disagree with the opinion.
It is true that there are various advantages of good news. To begin with, good news can not only provide readers with inspiration but also motivate them to do proper things. In fact, when people watch charity events on social media channels, they tend to take actions to help the disadvantaged. Besides, it will inspire audiences to widen their knowledge to get achievements as their role models. Another reason worth mentioning is that it creates positive feelings for people. To be more specific, people will feel a sense of happiness when they are exposure to good news frequently. As a result, this influences people’s living attitudes, which makes them more optimistic.
Nevertheless, bad news also brings certain benefits. Firstly, it gives warning about dangers. With the high increase of the crime rate, ensuring safety is essential. By accessing to this information, people will be more cautions by locking house’s door or avoiding going out at midnight. Also, when people see the weather forecast, they will have well preparation while traveling by taking umbrella, raincoat. Moreover, another advantage to be given is that bad news helps people raise awareness of social issues. For example, after people read articles about natural damages such as: earthquakes, droughts, tornadoes, they will take action to contribute to environment protection.
In conclusion, for the reasons above, I believe that the media should contain both good news and bad news equally.
- Some people think that it is better for students to learn local history than world history.Do you agree or disagree? 60
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 75
- The best way to deal with environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- TOPIC: The pie chart below show global Internet users’ favorite social media platforms from 2011 to 2013. 73
- TOPIC: The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... articles about natural damages such as: earthquakes, droughts, tornadoes, they w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29044117647 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71658837525 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639705882353 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1627114708 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9444444444 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24975451854 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859314925443 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926625847322 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207461681043 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096064569362 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.