Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors.
Education is one of the most striking topics in modern society. Some people claim that universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. From my perspective, university is a place where the professors impart knowledge to students to expand their horizon. At the same time, the university is a place where it should offer students more professional academic environment to do a research or investigate. So, in my opinion, spending money in buying facilities or in hiring famous professors should be allocated equally.
A university will be more attractive by hiring well-known professors. For example, I am a student study in Kunming medical university. In our school, there is a professor who can make the boring subject vivid and the hard work easy to understand. Students love to attend his lectures and always put heart and soul into the ocean of knowledge. So he is the most popular teacher in our college and his courses are without absence. If I want to listen to his class with having a seat, I need to go to the classroom in advance.You can see that how charming the professor is, it makes university more attractive.
Moreover, it’s also important that universities should buy advanced equipment to offer students and professors a comfortable and professional academic environment. For instance, in Kunming medical university, a most updated PCR made in the USA in 2019 was introduced 2 months ago into the biology laboratory which can analyze a complicated sample of blood to provide the biology professor details to decode diabetes. Without this facility the professor cannot continue the research which he devotes to. Indeed, he would job-hop to another better university which supplies the advanced equipment to continues his study leading to a great loss of the former university.
In summary, a good professor and the sufficient facilities of a university cannot be separated. I do hold that universities should spend money in buying facilities and hiring famous professors equally.
- Whether the painting was a work by Rembrandt 73
- Whether the painting was a work by Rembrandt? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
- gold mask 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professors should be allocated equally. A university will be more attractive by ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: You
... need to go to the classroom in advance.You can see that how charming the professor...
^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is, it makes university more attractive. Moreover, it's also important that ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o a great loss of the former university. In summary, a good professor and the suf...
^^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es and hiring famous professors equally.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in summary, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25835866261 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05312756662 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544072948328 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4160032118 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.571428571 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340572968105 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129933056988 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183464452326 0.0737576698707 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234216316803 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14620503849 0.0645574589148 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.