Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it is impossible to be completely honest with your friend.
Honesty, as we all know, is our wealth. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, noticing the world is ruled now, one may find this contention sensible. In this regard, conversely, some people are inclined toward this opinion that it is impossible to be completely honest with friends. I am of the opinion that although honesty is adorable, it would bring trouble by revealing something or cause misunderstanding of the truth. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason which makes me hold this belief that candidness with friends is impossible is misunderstanding the truth. Regarding different situations which everyone may undergo, sometimes decisions are between bad and worse which required a person to decide by force. Besides, sometimes different factors which are out of one`s control are involved in one decision, so it makes it difficult and sometimes unreasonable to explain the whole situation for a friend. Although there are many debates about honesty and trust between friends, it is deniable that some facts are not arguable and depend on situations which ones faced with.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is privacy issues. Even though friends are confidentiality, many issues are related to the past or to the private life which nobody has the right to know unless one, ownself. Indeed, even between friends, some invisible boundaries deter people to reveal all hidden or unspoken sections of their lives. Nowadays, it is widely accepted that even close friends are not totally trustworthy and it would be better for a person to be conservative in sharing private life and do not try to tell every aspect of life or every experience she had. It is unarguable that ones should protect this privacy as much as she can, and if broke this border, and say even mysteries of her life as always said “one`s cannot put the time back” she will open the door for somebody who her intention might be abusing her emotionally or mentally.
To summarize, all contemplating remarks we safely concluded that totally being honest with friends, although admirable it is not possible. In fact, misunderstanding about the situation one endured or decisions one should have taken not only make honesty impossible but make it also unreasonable. Besides, hidden and unspoken sections of life, also boundaries even between friends prevent them from total honesty.
- These days, people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations. Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them. What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time? 73
- Some people prefer to eat meals at restaurants, while others prefer to prepare and eat food in their own homes. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “When people succeed, it is entirely because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with their success.” Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 76
- When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school do you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation 68
- parents are involved in their children`s education. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, if, may, regarding, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21662468514 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89894997269 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554156171285 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4918505076 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.823529412 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14834044093 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491833299556 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067334348866 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945210877074 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212851855553 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.